Re: LVMthinp (was: default file system - Comparison to Workstation TS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2014-02-28 0:21 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 15:48:19 <mitr> (Again, having a per-directory instead of per-user quotas would be rather beneficial here)

A related item that came up is quotas. XFS supports project quotas. So that's possible in the case where you're on the fence if something should have a separate LV. Project quotas were just proposed as an ext4 feature last month.

Interesting; that means that having a single / partition can be an universal default, instead of supporting / recommending separate /tmp and /var/log.  [1] says that group and project quotas are mutually exclusive, though; is it reasonable to effectively say "you may not be able set quotas for group storage, unless the group owns a single subdirectory tree?"
   Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux