Re: lvresize and XFS, was: default file system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:33 AM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


>>>     fsadm failed: 3
> 

> man fsadm
> 
> DIAGNOSTICS
>       On  successful completion, the status code is 0.  A status code of 2 indicates the operation was interrupted by the user.  A
>       status code of 3 indicates the requested check operation could not be performed because the filesystem is mounted  and  does
>       not support an online fsck(8).  A status code of 1 is used for other failures.

Yeah but did fsadm fail? No, as a whole its operation succeeded. Can we say fsadm failed to run fsck? I guess that's one way to look at it, but then it failed to understand it shouldn't request a check operation on XFS in the first place.

Chris Murphy

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux