On 26.02.2014 10:16, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hello, I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on bitbucket. regards, Nikos [0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282 [1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
FWIW, this is how eigen does it: # Source file is at: http://bitbucket.org/eigen/eigen/get/3.1.3.tar.bz2 # Renamed source file so it's not just a version number Source0: eigen-%{version}.tar.bz2 Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
