Seems like bitbucket uses unversioned tar ball, not the best approch
https://bitbucket.org/yarosla/httpress/get/tip.tar.gz
I would make my own tarball from the git checkout and document in the spec how to make it
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
Tim
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I've submitted a while ago a review-request on a package [0] that is
taken from bitbucket.org. Unfortunately there was no reviewer yet, and I
suspect that is because unlike github [1] we have no rules on how to
handle bitbucket. Have other packagers experienced something similar in
other software? Is there a "good" way to handle repository-distributed
software? As it is now in [0] I've tried to simulate the github rules on
bitbucket.
regards,
Nikos
[0]. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062282
[1]. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
