Re: Packages with missing %check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:45:11PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I have identified 551 packages on the Fedora 20 source DVD which are
> missing a %check section in their spec files but are very likely to
> have a test suite. See
> https://github.com/atodorov/fedora-scripts/blob/master/sample-data/fedora-20/srpms-with-tests-WITHOUT-check-in-fedora-20-dvd
> 
> For a few of them I already had bug open previously (will filter the
> list later when I run my scripts against latest Rawhide).
> 
> I have the following questions:
> 
> 1) Do we consider this a bug and if yes what priority do you give it?
> From last week discussions it looks like most people prefer to have
> tests executed in %check.
> 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Test_Suites

So in some set of cases this would be a bug.  I don't have an estimate of
how many test suites would be "practical to" execute the test suite though.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgps3m2_Ak5Vp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux