Re: Packages with missing %check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



На 25.02.2014 13:57, Michael Schwendt написа:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:47:01 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:

https://github.com/atodorov/fedora-scripts/blob/master/sample-data/fedora-20/srpms-with-tests-WITHOUT-check-in-fedora-20-dvd


Could you add a short classifier to each src.rpm name, which sums up why
your checker believes there is a test-suite available that's not run in
%check. For example, "make-check-target" found or "tests-subdir" found or
something like that?


Not at the moment but I will think about it. Currently the WITHOUT files are
just the diff between WITH files with diff formatting cleared away.

e.g. with-tests-WITHOUT-check == diff with-check with-tests

Well, your check may be too simplified. I've had a look at

   /mnt/fedora/l/libetpan-1.1-7.fc20.src.rpm

and it contains a "tests" subdir with a few test programs, but no test-suite
to run automatically.


I said it didn't have a %check section in the spec file, not that it was missing tests. Hope its more clear now.

Whether or not the contents of the tests/ directory is a bunch of simple scripts to run or a proper test suite I can't tell without a manual inspection.

--
Alex


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux