On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 08:57 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
>>>
>>> == Topic ==
>>> # additional repository
>>> fedora-{incubator,ugly}
>>> * better name than ugly based on content of repo
>>> * github-like frontend for copr
>>> * discuss policies/procedures for accepting copr repo
>>
>>
>> Just a note maybe how multilib is handled by those repos should be
>> discussed. coprs lack of multilib support is already causing problems
>> for people trying out the gnome 3.12 test repo.
>> We probably should use mash to compose them to make them really
>> "compatible" with how we do things in the main repo.
>>
>> (Not sure I will be there for the meeting time so dropping the comment
>> here).
>> _______________________________________________
>> env-and-stacks mailing list
>> env-and-stacks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
>>
> If user decide to build only for x86_64, you can't even have multilib
> problem ;-) Or do you mean different issue?
Sure you can if someone installs from the repo and have i686 versions
of a library installed.
Ex:
User has:
libfoo-1.0.i686
libfoo-1.0.x86_64
installed
Repo ships libfoo-1.1.x86_64
=> User can't install it => problem ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
