On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:50:51 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Sorry, didn't mean to denigrate anyone's hard work.
> _Some_ of my packages (hence "partly") have been re-used, and this doesn't
> bother me at all, I was just pointing the fact out. A quick glance shows
> that of the 550 Extras package I have the build files from, about 70 were
> directly based on packages I made, with the changelog kept intact from the
> point they were re-used.
$ cd fedora.us/stable
$ find . -name \*.spec | wc -l
371
$ grep -i matthias * -R | awk -F: '{ print $1 }' | uniq | wc -l
13
$ grep -i saou * -R | awk -F: '{ print $1 }' | uniq | wc -l
12
$ grep -i freshrpm * -R | awk -F: '{ print $1 }' | uniq | wc -l
1
And that includes spec files where your name appears in an arbitrary
location.
$ cd ../testing
$ find . -name \*.spec | wc -l
55
$ grep -i saou * -R | awk -F: '{ print $1 }' | uniq | wc -l
0
> Some others (hard to tell how many, and definitely
> not worth bothering digging to know) were re-used with the changelog reset
> (alsa stuff, apt... haven't looked further than "a" ;-)).
Ah, that's your theory. I think e.g. alsa packages and a few others,
were rewritten beyond recognition.
--
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux 2.6.9-1.667
loadavg: 1.50 1.18 1.09
