Matthew Miller wrote:That seems reasonable, and in that case, something like "fedora-presets" and "fedora-workstation-presets", etc., seems appropriate, and the corresponding release package could pull them in.What about my proposal to drop the preset directly onto the file system (but in /etc rather than in /usr/share as we do now) in the live kickstarts?
That would mean that if we wanted to enable a new service by default, admins wouldn't get it on upgrades. Which may be fine with the traditional rpm-on-client-side installs.
But I think this "upgrades diverge from fresh reinstalls" is a deeply fundamental problem - one I am simply not allowing to occur in the OSTree replication model.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct