Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>    From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few
> packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't
> carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump.
>    Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should announce on devel
> list first. Looks like harfbuzz package is picked twice for these rebuilds.
> Both rebuilds happened in within 30 minutes time period.

Your guess is as good as mine. I asked on IRC in #fedora-devel after
my package failed to build on Rawhide and was told that there was a
soname bump for icu and was given an all clear to rebuild it. I then
nphilipp rebuild it after me for whatever reason. I have no idea why
they rebuilt again (maybe they had a reason).

Ideally the person who did the soname bump for icu would have rebuilt
harfbuzz with it (erack@xxxxxxxxxx). This happens quite often and it's
quite annoying.

Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux