Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver: >>> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? >>> >>> Here's an example: >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20 >> >> worthless as long "results are informative only" >> it only will get effective if the build is purged until it passes > > That is untrue. I've pulled builds myself when I notice this fails. > Please don't generalize like that. It's effective and useful for > maintainers that pay attention stats would be interesting how many pay attention in case they not get hurted noticeable many maintainers do not pay attention if it does not hurt otherwise systemd-bugs, bugs/typos in systemd-units and systemd itself logged with every single "systemctl daemon-reload" or reboot would not make it in GA releases and stay there over months
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
