On 10.02.2014 17:11, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during >> the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then >> in F-20. >> >> Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most of them this >> is caused by some packages still not having a proper workflow where they >> commit all fixes / upgrades to rawhide first and then merge them into >> older branches as appropriate. This often leads to some fixes being >> in the F-20 branch and some in the devel branch, and neither having the >> complete set of fixes ... >> >> I've filed bugs for all of the pkgs I've encountered with this issue: >> >> 1063257 - accountsservice in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063258 - ecore in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063259 - gnome-disk-utils in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063260 - gnome-initial-setup in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063261 - iscsi-initiator-utils in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063262 - libgdata in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063263 - network-manager-applet in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063264 - netpbm in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063266 - planner in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063267 - python-apsw in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> 1063270 - usb_modeswitch-data in rawhide is older then in F-20 >> >> Note that the bug description is written in an attempt to educate >> the packager. >> >> So 2 questions: >> >> 1) What can we do to educate packagers more about this ? >> >> 2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects >> this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not >> only getting the issue fixed, but also educating the packager? >> >> This script should then be run on say a weekly basis, so that ie >> build-issues hindering a build in rawhide don't cause daily >> false-positive spam. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > That's my list: > > NetworkManager > NetworkManager-glib > accountsservice > accountsservice-libs > appdata-tools > bluez > bluez-cups > bluez-libs > gnome-disk-utility > gnome-initial-setup > iscsi-initiator-utils > libgdata > libgdata-devel > libnm-gtk > nm-connection-editor > ruby > ruby-irb > ruby-libs > rubygem-bigdecimal > rubygem-io-console > rubygem-psych > usb_modeswitch-data > libmbim* libqmi* ModemManager* It does not matter where they are, but they are certainly older. And should always go in pair with NetworkManager* & usb_modeswitch*. poma -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct