On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks? > > For f19 and f20 updates, yes... in an advisory manner. > > But not for rawhide since it has no bodhi update to add the comment to > or know to check. It is not the Rawhide update that needs to be checked but the F19/F20 update, because the problem results from the lack of an Rawhide update, not because a bad one was issued. However, IMHO it makes more sense to just hook into AutoQA instead of running the same test twice. Also it would allow to respond in a timely manner which might better help to educate maintainers instead of when there are several days between the bad update creation and the reaction to it. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
