On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:54:47AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > What is bundling in the sense of > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries>? > > In my opinion, the page deals with source package contents. > > But there are other things a package can do "bundle" things in the > binary packages, by copying code and data from installed packages in > the build root. These have comparable negative effects to bundling > at the source package level. Examples are static linking (already > covered elsewhere), Java "static" linking (jarjar, Maven bundling, > perhaps others), things like minify/lstrip/fatpack, copying programs > and .so files out of the build root, etc. > > Are these post-SRPM copying mechanism in scope for the "no bundled > libraries" page, or should they be covered in other places? These strategies usually come to the FPC in the context of bundled libraries but they're actually static linking examples. In general, the FPC considers bundled libraries to be very problematic, static linking (and their analogs, like packaging a library's source and then having a dependent package compile against that) to be somewhat problematic, and shared libraries to be preferred. When there is "no reason" (the FPC is often called upon to evaluate whether a valid reason exists) not to take the preferred strategy, packages need to be modified to take that route. If the FPC finds a valid reason for that not to work, then the static linking alternatives are looked at and finally the bundling alternatives. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpT_Hy7XNeVD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
