On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 01:48 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > This changes the .la/.so matter a good bit IMO. Where are we now? Do > we still delete .la files till we find out that it breaks something at > run-time? Or do we include .la files (it's a policy for Debian, isn't > it?) till we find that something doesn't build? What is worse? I still think including them is definitely wrong for libraries that support pkg-config. We're pretty inconsistent about it though, "ls /usr/lib/*.la" is far from empty. Havoc
