On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The idea of not closing bugs that have comments after the EOL > notification doesn't necessarily make things better, I don't think; we'd > just have errors in the other direction. Say someone dropped a note 'oh > yeah, this is working now!' - it would be silly not to close the bug, > right? The question here is what's more common: * "This works for me" comment after an EOL warning. With my proposal, the maintainer would have to manually set the bug to WONTFIX. * "This is still a problem" comment after an EOL warning. Currently, this requires a maintainer to intervene and bump the version. I assume the latter is more common. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In fact the first message actually tells the reporter to do that: > > : Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not > : be able to fix it before Fedora 18 is end of life. If you would still > : like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a > : later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to > : a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 18's end of life. > > so if they can't do so then that message seems a little suboptimal. Not only that, the message provides no guidance to the bug reporter if the problem still occurs. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
