On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:36 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Please don't. This is not accurate. Bugzappers has been inactive for > > years now. Packagers and QA team members (and possibly other groups I > > don't know about) get editbugs privileges via automatic inheritance into > > the 'fedorabugs' group, and 'fedorabugs' group admins can hand them out > > on a case-by-case basis. > > Yes, I'm fully aware Bugzappers is dead (I subscribe to the same lists you do, > Adam). So, er, why did you advise someone to apply to it? For now its functions are subsumed into QA, so if you want to get editbugs privs in order to do triage work, the appropriate thing to do is follow the QA group join procedure - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join - and apply for the qa FAS group. > Perhaps David doesn't want to become a packager to edit a bug. You sort of skipped the bit about the QA team, and about just asking someone else to re-open it, which is what has happened. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
