Re: icecat or/and firefox?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a "more free"
>> version firefox.

I'd argue it's *less* free since it seeks to restrict what you can do:
"Finally, we need to change free browsers to detect and block
nontrivial nonfree JavaScript in web pages." But:


> My view:  "It's a package like any arbitrary other". So, if it complies to
> the rules applied elsewhere, I don't see much reasons why it can not be part
> of Fedora.
>

If people do want to use and someone willing to maintain it I don't see why not.

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux