On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:25:04 +0100 Eike Rathke <erack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > If time permits I'd like to do an upgrade of ICU to 52.1 next week, > which leads to the usual soname bump. > > As quite a lot of packages are affected by this, is anyone objecting > and can point out a better time for the upgrade? Hum... perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see anything that is directly affected. There's no packages that buildrequire or require icu? Or am I looking at the wrong package? I guess you mean libicu? In that case: 389-admin-1.1.35-1.fc20.src.rpm 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.fc21.src.rpm 389-ds-base-1.3.2.10-1.fc21.src.rpm 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.fc20.src.rpm boost-1.54.0-10.fc21.src.rpm brltty-4.5-9.fc21.src.rpm calibre-1.21.0-1.fc21.src.rpm calligra-2.7.91-1.fc21.src.rpm couchdb-1.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm dee-1.0.14-2.fc20.src.rpm dwdiff-2.0.9-1.fc21.src.rpm evolution-data-server-3.11.4-1.fc21.src.rpm fcitx-4.2.8.3-1.fc21.src.rpm firebird-2.5.2.26539.0-9.fc21.src.rpm fontmatrix-0.9.99-14.r1218.fc21.src.rpm gdisk-0.8.8-1.fc21.src.rpm gnustep-base-1.24.4-8.fc20.src.rpm harfbuzz-0.9.25-1.fc21.src.rpm ibus-qt-1.3.2-5.fc20.src.rpm icu-50.1.2-10.fc21.src.rpm idzebra-2.0.52-5.fc20.src.rpm libcdr-0.0.14-5.fc21.src.rpm libcommuni-2.2.0-2.fc21.src.rpm libe-book-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm libguestfs-1.25.26-1.fc21.src.rpm libmspub-0.0.6-4.fc21.src.rpm libreoffice-4.2.0.3-2.fc21.src.rpm libtranslit-0.0.3-2.fc21.src.rpm libvisio-0.0.31-1.fc21.src.rpm mapnik-2.2.0-5.fc21.src.rpm msort-8.53-11.fc20.src.rpm nodejs-node-stringprep-0.1.8-1.fc20.src.rpm nqp-0.0.2013.09-1.fc21.src.rpm openttd-1.3.3-1.fc21.src.rpm open-vm-tools-9.4.0-2.fc21.src.rpm pam_mapi-0.1.2-4.fc20.src.rpm parrot-5.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm php-5.5.8-2.fc21.src.rpm php-symfony-icu-1.2.0-1.fc21.src.rpm pion-net-4.0.9-10.fc21.src.rpm pyicu-1.5-3.fc20.src.rpm qt5-qtbase-5.2.0-4.fc21.src.rpm qt5-qtwebkit-5.2.0-2.fc21.src.rpm R-3.0.2-3.fc21.src.rpm rakudo-star-0.0.2013.09_5.5.0-1.fc21.src.rpm raptor2-2.0.9-2.fc20.src.rpm rubygem-charlock_holmes-0.6.9.4-3.fc20.src.rpm sword-1.6.2-11.fc20.src.rpm texlive-2013-4.20131226_r32488.fc21.src.rpm tracker-0.17.0-1.fc21.src.rpm unar-1.8-1.fc21.src.rpm v8-3.14.5.10-3.fc21.src.rpm webkitgtk-2.2.4-2.fc21.src.rpm webkitgtk3-2.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm yaz-4.2.56-3.fc20.src.rpm zarafa-7.1.7-1.fc21.src.rpm zorba-2.9.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Are there any changes in the 50->52.1 jump that would need patches/changes? Or should it just mostly be a rebuild? Do you have any provenpackager(s) who can help you rebuild things? > If not, I'll probably announce it on Monday and do the upgrade on > Wednesday. Seems fine. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
