Am 25.01.2014 17:40, schrieb Tomasz Torcz: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 01:33:07AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> David Sommerseth wrote: >>> So, I wonder if it can be considered to enable a "downgrade path" for >>> bluez and depending packages, as described in the "Contingency Plan": >>> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5> >> >> Officially downgrading BlueZ from 5 to 4 in a shipped release is totally >> impractical. It just cannot be done realistically. (Contingency plans are >> only intended to be enacted BEFORE the release.) > > I think we need to to upgrade PulseAudio to 5.0. That version, with > bluetooth audio A2DP support, is currently at ”Release Candidate” stage: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2014-January/019858.html > > Such upgrade in stable release need to be done carefuly with above-standard > amount of testing. But I think it's the only viable way my expierience with pulseaudio-upgrades is good Rex Dieter had PA 4.0 in a un-official repo months before it arrived in Fedora and there was no regression using that repo on current Fedora what about a scratch-build announced on @devel and @users to get active testers?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
