Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 10:43 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

> > I think that's being unnecessarily harsh on the testers. It's not at all
> > obvious to anyone that you ought to test update/install of another
> > package in order to validate an update to selinux-policy-targeted .
> > Hell, I don't do that.
> 
> Doesn't

No, it doesn't.

>  / can't AutoQA (or whatever we're calling it these days) pick
> up the new package, install it in a VM, and run through some automated
> tests:
> 
>  - Does Fedora still boot with this package added?
>  - Does GNOME still come up?
>  - Does yum still work?

I answered precisely that question a couple of days ago in the other
thread:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-January/194155.html
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux