Am Freitag, den 24.01.2014, 19:18 +0100 schrieb drago01: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Fabian Deutsch <fabian.deutsch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 24.01.2014, 00:55 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > >> it is time to analyze the fallout from the following catastrophic > >> Fedora 20 > >> regression: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 > >> "rpm scriptlets are exiting with status 127" > > > > Hey, > > > > can't we add a default boot entry which starts the system in permissive > > mode? > > How would that help? If a user knows enough about the issue to try it > he/she could just switch to permissive mode. Having the ability to revoke stable updates an a way to handle automatic downgrades of revoked updates including a temporary switching SELinux to permissive mode would IMHO be a better solution for the case a buggy update went to stable and the system is still up and running. With this way the user has nothing more to do than running a new update-check. -- Regards, Heiko Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
