Kevin Fenzi wrote: >I mean, I'm a maintainer for the Fedora apg package. >Last upstream release was 2003. I very rarely touch it. >Yet, from time to time I still use it here, I suspect, but do not know >that others install and use it. > >It has no bugs currently opened against it. > >It's not failed a mass rebuild. > >The last time I touched it was to move it to use systemd unit files >(it can optionally run a network service to return it's data). > >Is this a package that should be removed for being abandoned? I'm not familiar with APG but from your description it sounds like a perfect example of stable and reliable software – the best kind there is. So what if it's abandoned, if no one has found any bugs? Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
