On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 01:23:13AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Lemenkov wrote: > > IMHO you're absolutely wrong. Fortunately it seems that not so much > > people agree with you since I see a lot of activily on a given > > third-party proprietary web service (compared with a dead silence at > > fedorahosted). So actually people already voted, and they voted > > against Fedorahosted. You just need to realize that we already "lost" > > "control" here. I understand that numbers could be much more > > convincing and I hope somebody will measure activity at fedorahosted > > and at GitHub but I doubt the results disprove my point. > > That's why we need enforcement. There should be a statement from a competent > committee (Board, FESCo, whomever) that effective NOW, stuff can ONLY be > uploaded to production (and staging too, probably) infrastructure if it is > either: > (a) developed on Fedora Hosted or > (b) has a demonstrable non-Fedora upstream and significant use at other > projects (i.e., a clause intended for stuff like Trac that's clearly reuse > of existing third-party community code, NOT stuff like pkgdb2). I'm confused, are you talking about: https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ ? Just wondering if you're talking just because you want to open your mouth or if I should actually listen to you... Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
