On Jan 23, 2014 1:12 PM, "Stephen Gallagher" <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/23/2014 01:43 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Christopher Meng wrote:
> >> But you can do this on copr IMO. Also update-testing is not just
> >> a place for updates to have a break, you can let it satisfy the
> >> needs of testing for unstable.
> >
> > Well, that's kinda abusing updates-testing. IMHO, COPR is the much
> > better option until you have something reasonably close to going
> > stable.
> >
>
> The other problem with using updates-testing in this way is that it
> makes it more difficult if you have to deliver a real bug or security
> fix to stable. Now you have to unpush your testing version, mangle
> your git history, file a new update ...
>
>
> I agree with Kevin that this is pretty much exactly what COPR is good
> at (and what I'm using it for myself[1]).
>
> 1) http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/ReviewBoard2/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlLhd8QACgkQeiVVYja6o6N1WgCgqGU51RjTv4/uizYPOV5HSBhE
> WFkAoLAl4Twg3iHIBgEx1O5++juLlaXH
> =rNyt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
Is there something inherent to COPRs that solves the problem of duplicate paths, ie /usr/bin/mercurial from two different sources?
If I missed something, a link with an appropriate measure of mocking would be welcome.
--Pete
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
