On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:11 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 19:43 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > But you can do this on copr IMO. Also update-testing is not just a place > > > for updates to have a break, you can let it satisfy the needs of testing > > > for unstable. > > > > Well, that's kinda abusing updates-testing. IMHO, COPR is the much better > > option until you have something reasonably close to going stable. > > It's not just kinda abusing updates-testing, *it is abusing > updates-testing*. updates-testing has a specific and explicitly > specified purpose: to test updates before they go to -stable. That is > all that it is for. Anything in updates-testing must be something that > the maintainer expects to submit to stable once testing has indicated > that it works correctly. In other words: Christopher, if you're currently doing this, please move the packages to a COPR or other venue more appropriate for this purpose, and stop doing it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
