On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 09:54 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 01:01 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > > On 01/20/2014 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > The bug currently under discussion was caused by a change that came in > > > > inadvertently, not intentionally, and was actually intended for Rawhide. > > > > > > I can't help wondering if there's an opportunity for process/workflow > > > improvement right there. > > > > Well, I'd have to leave that to the SELinux folks to comment, but I > > would say it's only happened once since I came to Fedora that I > > remember, and everyone makes mistakes sometimes :/ > > Exactly. And because everybody makes mistakes, we have processes to > catch and prevent those inevitable mistakes from going out. I think it > would be great to make adjustments to the process / policy so that we > get better at preventing this... In context, the question as I understood it was about the SELinux developers'/packagers' workflow, not the update workflow. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
