Am 23.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > On 01/23/2014 12:09 PM, David Tardon wrote: >> No, I think your reasoning is faulty and your attempts to see everything >> in just black and white is fundamentally flawed. Anyway, that_was not_ >> the point of my mail. What I wanted to point out is that forced removal >> of packages_is not_ going to guarantee more packager's attention to >> the rest of the distribution. And it can in fact have the opposite >> effect, by alienating and losing existing packagers. > > I never implied that it would guarantee any more package attention that's an assumption you made so what is the benefit then in propose drop packages where *upstream not* every 2-3 years starts a complete rewrite with only half of the features, a lot of bugs and regressions to qualify the next 3 years updates and after all the mess is fixed start the next rewrite to qualify "ongoing development" for a lifetime? if it ain't broken don't fix it!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
