Am 23.01.2014 10:23, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: > "A*lot* of those applications haven't seen an upstream release > in half a decade" Which poses security risk and bugs not being dealt > and bad end user experience if our end user base chooses to install it have you ever considered software as done and no known bugs? > ( because if they were actually being maintained here with us those fixes > would have found it's way upstream and new releases been made right ). > > But clearly you dont understand that maybe you do not understand that there is no golden rule to fix bugs and release updates for no reason ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/apps/sound/mp3-utils/mp3info/ upstream may dead, upstream my be alive but nothing to do the software does what it is expected to do so why should there be a new release? not every software developer makes changes for the sake of the change
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
