-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2014 08:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of > PRD. Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be > altered. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document I > have some comments and feedback on this PRD that I figured I'd submit before it comes to FESCo. I'm very sorry this is so late, but I haven't had a chance to read it previously. In general, I think the content is good and the goals makes sense. I just have a few minor suggestions: * The "Vision Statement" isn't one. The purpose of a vision statement is to describe the state that you want to achieve. A better vision statement here might be "Fedora is the preferred ecosystem of choice for new software development to occur in any language and on any framework." * The "Mission Statement" describes the working group. It should be a short, high-level description of the strategy to achieve the vision. Suggestion: "The Environment and Stacks Working Group will research and develop new or improved methods of packaging and deploying software for the Fedora community". * "An example of a Koji-git integration: a successful build of a package in Koji triggers automatic generation of a tag in package's git repository so that the packager can easily access the content of the particular build using pure git." This seems overly-specific for a PRD (and also the builds are already associated with a commit ID, so the tag is a convenience, not really an enhancement). * "We will encourage upstream projects to move toward a CI model." +1000 * I'd like to see more about DevAssistant. I personally know a fair amount about it, but the average reader of this document will probably not. Same with COPR, Koji and Bodhi in several places; the document assumes that the reader is familiar with them (and the one-sentence definition section is a little light on detail). I realize you link out, but it would read easier with a little more content in the document itself. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLexg4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6OLAwCdHzDVVssnosyj7HzLwuU1/3MW u5sAnRn7KHJ9hespUfJoHKXuReLON3id =rqvS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
