On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 12:53 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:18:39PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote: > > You'd also want text in the poster; process names are one obvious > > textual annotation that should be easy to obtain. It might also be > > interested for processes to be able to provide extra annotations; for > > Why not reuse the X11 visualiser for bandwidth. The one that shows all the > toolkit caused stalls. It'll do the same job for run versus disk wait I'm guessing you mean the xplot/netplot displays from Jim Gettys and Keith Packard's talk about X Window System performance - (http://keithp.com/~keithp/talks/usenix2003/). It's certainly related to the kind of thing I'm talking about here, though I'm not sure its quite directly applicable... it applies more to displaying how well disk read-ahead is working for a particular application, then to viewing the dependency graph for a set of processes. I'd agree it's a relevant reference point, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
