Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Martin Langhoff (martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> Puppet (the client side, at least) should be installable with >> relatively thin deps, so it can manage lightweight hosts... >> >> I am having trouble disentangling which deps to file a bug against; >> maybe virt-what ? > > You need to make sure your transaction is pulling in classic ruby > rather than jruby. > > # repoquery -q --whatprovides "ruby(runtime_executable)" > jruby-0:1.7.2-5.fc20.noarch > ruby-0:2.0.0.353-16.fc20.i686 > ruby-0:2.0.0.353-16.fc20.x86_64 I am pretty sure this bug is related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910093 Yes, filed almost a year ago. Yes there was no single reply except automated one. The problem is the resolver. Let's say there are 2 packages: Package A has "Provides: ruby = 1.9" Package B has "Provides: ruby = 2.0" You are installing package C, some dependency has "Requires: ruby" so the resolver pulls in Package A because it provides that dependency. Then it goes deeper in the dependency tree and something else has "Requires: ruby >= 2.0" so the resolver pull in Package B. Now you have both installed even though only Package B is needed. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
pgpNe36cgreMc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
