Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote: >> While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is >> worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived >> old repos? > > If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills their > source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's technically > their problem if our repository goes away, but it would be a friendly > gesture to at least keep the source RPMs around. The thing is those copr repos will likely depend on EOLed Fedora repos. Do we keep *those* around? I guess the answer will be different for each mirror. Some will keep those repos for longer, some shorter. But as you say, source RPMs might be nice to have at least. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
pgpKc8RecsRVr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
