Re: llvm 3.4 in rawhide time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


>
>
> On 14 Jan 2014 06:04, "David Airlie" < airlied@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm
> > 3.4
>
> Assuming there aren't any major stumbling blocks, are there any plans to back
> port llvm 3.4 to f20 (like was done for llvm 3.3 in f19)?
>
> I need clang 3.4 for my day job but have been holding off on a parallel
> installable version until I know what's happening in Fedora proper.

Maybe, we might like it for GPU drivers, but I want to see how hairy it is,
so far it looks rather hairy, most of the projects failed on my simple just rebuild it.

iirc last time the rebase was required in order to get a later Mesa into the distro. I will hold off for a few days to see just how hairy things are. If you decide not to rebase f20 i will build something privately, or even a copr build if anybody else is interested in it.

If you need any help with testing, patches, etc i would be happy to help where i can.
 
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux