Am 13.01.2014 00:43, schrieb Alec Leamas: > First of all, this is not, and have never been a question of disabled repos. Or should not have. "yum clean all" > refers to cleaning all metadata, not all repos. It only operates on one single repo, be it implicit (the default > link) or an explicit -r option. > > This is what confuses. I know: been there done that... Even though the documents are clear, the behaviour does > indeed cause confusion for some reason even though it's well-defined. > > Of course, changing semantics for yum is a bad idea, agreed. I did not have anything like that in mind. At most, > some info on what buildroot which is used in the output, or similar measures. > > For dnf, I guess one could possibly think somewhat more free. Personally, I tend to think that it's the implicit > buildroot which causes much of this trouble. > > What happens if we get rid of the implcit buildroot, forcing us to specify it every time? With 'default' as a legal > option? Personally, I tend to think this might make things a little clearer. *what* is a "buildroot" in case of YUM/DNF? in any case nothing relevant for a user and said that i use Fedora and YUM for many years, the only conetxt of "buildroot" for me is rpmbuild and that has no context to YUM/DNF at all
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
