On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 11:02 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > People are working on taskotron ( successor of autoqa ) and this will > > likely prevent this kind of issue in the future, I hope. If you feel > > that's important to make sure this doesn't happen, they will always > > accept any kind of help. But in the mean time, as this is IMHO the most > > beging type of breakage, I think we can tolerate them from time to time > > until we can properly automate the checking. > > We do have the automated checking we just don't use it. (autoqa does > dep checks but we do not do any action on them; the updates causing > broken deps should simply be unpushed). As we've explained multiple times, the current depcheck test is too unreliable to 'enforce'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
