Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jan 7, 2014 4:53 AM, "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
> >
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
>
> It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept
> Those who want to keep "running" kernel may need to speak up [2]
>
> [1]
> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-packages-called-kernel
>
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310

After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who want this change to cc themselves on the bug report.  If the cc reaches 40 he'll reconsider.  Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works for the maintainer I guess.

-Toshio

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux