On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 07:01:33PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: > I strenuously agree about the need for a solution providing tutorial > content. There's plenty on the wiki, if you can find it, but wiki > content just doesn't feel qualified and doesn't invoke the same trust as > something that's clearly taken more effort to curate and present. I And our wiki is split between that kind of user documentation, developer documentation, pages used to track work (and even as a workflow engine), random other things, and of course a healthy dose of accumulated cruft. > If the rest of the community expressed an interest, I'm confident that > we could come up with an inviting and productive solution. If anyone > wants to pursue it, I invite you to bring this portion of the > conversation to docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . I don't think we need a > second group to support a second documentation product - or an expansion > of the existing lineup - just a more active docs group. The venture is > really peripheral to Fedora.next - but a larger docs community would > help us keep up with such changes, one way or another. Absolutely! And to be clear, I wsa not suggesting starting a competing docs effort of some sort. What I want is to focus more interest and effort on what you're doing, so we do get that more active group. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
