Re: dnf versus yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2014 03:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 10:50 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
This is the first time I heard of DNF.
Looking at the page where differences between DNF and yum are
explained (http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html) my question
is: do we really need DNF to replace yum?

Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that DNF is no more than yum with
some different standard behavior and a couple of new command line
options. So why replace yum? If those changes are good why simply
don't change standard options in yum or add those new commands to yum?
Because yum's code is a mess. The primary point of the dnf rewrite is
not to alter the user interface, but to clean up the code itself.
That is great but it should support everything yum supported. Even Linux keeps old interfaces
around, if they are going to change there is at least a period where they are marked as deprecated
and with a caution they may be removed in the future!


--
Stephen Clark
NetWolves
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netwolves.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux