Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If not, what's the point of this initiative?

To reduce size, complexity, save time.
What do you mean by "*enforcing*", or how would you imagine that happening?

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:50 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> During last weeks Base WG discussion about package set and self hosting
>> of Base we came to a point where especially the self hosting of Base
>> would currently look absurd as we'd require more than 2000 components to
>> do so.
>
> Once you reduce the size of this set, do you forsee actually *enforcing*
> this in some way?  For example, by having separate package repositories?
>
> If not, what's the point of this initiative?
>
>
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



-- 

-Jon
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux