> If not, what's the point of this initiative? To reduce size, complexity, save time. What do you mean by "*enforcing*", or how would you imagine that happening? On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:50 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote: >> Hi everyone. >> >> During last weeks Base WG discussion about package set and self hosting >> of Base we came to a point where especially the self hosting of Base >> would currently look absurd as we'd require more than 2000 components to >> do so. > > Once you reduce the size of this set, do you forsee actually *enforcing* > this in some way? For example, by having separate package repositories? > > If not, what's the point of this initiative? > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- -Jon -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
