Re: Should redhat-release be versioned or unversioned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 20:00:12 -0800,
  Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Not sure what you mean, but it's kind of situational. There isn't a
Single Global Rule on exactly how 'virtual' provides should be
versioned, to my knowledge.

I was hoping there would be something that might describe how the version and release should be split or if they should only include a version or whatever. For example maybe the release should be everything after the last dash.

The examples I saw didn't provide versions and the documentation was pretty sparse. I didn't end up finding any useful guidance.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux