Re: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Markus Mayer <lotharlutz@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 08:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> OK, so I'll re-ask my original question.  Fedora 20 was released with
>> a broken update path from F19.  Should the release criteria be
>> amended?  This particular issue would have been avoided if F19's fedup
>> were frozen along with F20 and if all of the destined-for-stable
>> versions were tested together as a release criterion.
>>
>> --Andy
>>
>
> I'am definitely in favor of this. A working upgrade is as important as a
> working installation.
>
> A suggest that you create a draft of the release criteria change and fill a
> FESCO ticket.

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1214

--Andy

>
>
> regards
>     Markus
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux