Re: first encounters with SELINUX, with some suggestions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


> All RH developers do not work on FC3.  (A Lot run on RHEL 3 and AS 2.1).

Point taken.

> SELinux with strict policy was very difficult to develop on so a lot of 
> developers turned it
> off, now that it is targeted policy, they are using it more and more. 

Agreed - now that I understand the difference between the two, and
having read Colin's introduction, I see and understand how much better
"targeted" really is.  I guess a lot of people, myself included, got
burned during test cycles where strict was the default.

Please make sure people *realize* this subtle point - lots of people
turn SELINUX off by default completely because of this.

> Most of the problems
> we are seeing now are with different Apache setups, which most 
> developers would not
> have discovered on the desktop.

Understood, valid point.

Thomas

Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
And every time she sneezes
I think it's love and oh lord
I'm not ready for this sort of thing
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux