Re: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  - Install fedup 0.7.0
> >  - Try it and watch it fail or hang
> >  - Update to fedup 0.8.0 from updates-testing
> >  - Run fedup
> > 
> > ends up downloading all rpms *twice* a sucking up a correspondingly
> > immense amount of disk space.
> 
> Um, I'm fairly sure it doesn't. It only re-downloads stuff that's
> different from the previous run.

There was a bug whereby fedup-0.7.3 would delete all the downloaded RPMs after
failing to install them.  See:

	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020898

This is reportedly fixed in fedup-0.8.0.

David
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux