Re: Review swap: python-astropy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Review swap: python-astropy
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:36:51 +0800
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CACta-KbcOp6Pvt9PngnY85ScrD9T4uFJBS5T_3nCtLMUh7BExA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Deal.

I will review yours later.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Review swap: python-astropy
  - From: Sergio Pascual
- Re: Review swap: python-astropy
  - From: Christopher Meng
- Re: Review swap: python-astropy
  - From: Sergio Pascual

Prev by Date: Re: Review swap: python-astropy
Next by Date: Re: Inter-WG coordination: Stable application runtimes
Previous by thread: Re: Review swap: python-astropy
Next by thread: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux