On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:17:14PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > The issues reported against libvirt all appear to be false positives. > > Not entirely surprising since we already have coverity run against > > libvirt code nightly. > > > > Thanks for the quick response. Does Red Hat run it only for packages in > RHEL or it is run against all Fedora packages? If not, would it be > possible for Red Hat to do so and publish the results on a regular basis? > That might be a useful service. I'm not sure what is done for general RHEL/Fedora scans. The libvirt team just have a setup which lets us run it against our upstream GIT repos nightly. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
