On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:45 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote: > Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2 > builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and > filelists. :) That's still not really enough; that metadata doesn't express anything *close* to all the possible capabilities of a package. Not saying this isn't a good idea, just that it should involve careful manual double checking of compose logs and the like. We already have AutoQA running rpmdiff and rpmguard tests on new builds, btw. I doubt it would be difficult to hook this effort up to that AutoQA stuff somehow so you can get nice rpmdiff/rpmguard results between your test builds. tflink/kparal (CCed) may have some thoughts. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
