On 2013-12-06, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Petr Pisar wrote: > >> On 2013-12-04, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Petr Pisar wrote: >>>> [snip] and GPLv2 and GPLv3+. >>> >>> Huh? WTF is upstream smoking there? >>> >> Upstream releases a tar ball bundling a lot of subprojects. Thus the >> complicated license. I do a licence review each new release and I always >> find new licenses. This time I had to drop two files because of >> non-commercial requirement. > > My main complaint there was about the mix of incompatible GPL versions. > If they are two separate executables, there is no problem. But still you need to declare the licenses at the RPM level in one line. Having conflicting license conjuction does not imply a conflict. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
