Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/06/2013 02:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:

On 12/06/2013 01:05 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 12/06/2013 01:59 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
I think abrt serves as good source of info in case of unexpected
crashes, which is quite important to have stable
system. So although being puzzled is not very nice, being
disappointed by crashing applications is much worse from my
point of view.

Again reports are one thing fixing is another...


So try to look at it from broader perspective - I see more benefits
in having abrt installed.

While this is true - my mother have no clue what Bugzilla means, and
even what is bug report - well in her term it is phone call to me
"Son, some weird box pop up, what should I do? I already hit Esc and
Enter and it still sit there".

This is disadvantage of being popular. Not every user is power user.


As well as those user not being able to "sanitize" their log(s) so they
might accidentally be submitting sensitive information...

JBG

ABRT can be configured to not bother users with reporting to bugzilla and only send a stripped information about the crash without any sensitive information [1]. So no need for users to sanitize their logs.


--Jirka

[1] https://github.com/abrt/faf/wiki/uReport
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux