On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 07:11:40 PM Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi list(s), >> > >> > We still doesn't have gnat compiler for %{arm} in Fedora. We (Ada >> > community) have compiled gcc with ada support using gcc-4.8.2 src.rpm >> > and tested in. It seems workable. At least we were able to compile most >> > of the >> > packages from the stack with it. >> > I'd like to discuss way how to get it in Fedora (chicken-egg problem >> > should be solved). >> >> That's relatively straight forward. We need a documented process to >> get it done. Once we have that I can sort it out with rel-eng but we >> would need the gcc maintainer to review/approve it. >> >> Generally what happens is that it would be built (or imported) into a >> side tag build. I suspect it'll be using something like a cross >> compiled version of ada which is then used to compile a native built >> version of ada which is then tagged into rawhide at which point the >> rest of the ada stack would be rebuilt. > Yes. We cross-compiled bootstrap and compiled native version using it. It's > original Fedora gcc without any modifications (just added arm to the gnat > arches list) and applied short patch [1] > It was the long process [2] in qemu with all tests performed. I'm going to > recompile it once more time using Cubieboard and move to documentation step > after. If you document it first I can test it on decent physical HW which should be a lot faster to save you some time. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct